Sociology Of Law - Brief U.s. Supremen Court Case - Mapp Vs. Ohio, 367 U.s. 643 (1961)

[name][professor /instructor][course]April 21 , 2007Case Brief : Mapp v . Ohio , 367 U .S . 643 (1961Facts of the CaseThe appellant had been convicted in Ohio of violation of one of the state s pornography statutes , Section 2905 .34 of the Ohio fiat Code It is undisputed that appellant lived on the second coiffure of a two-family residence . She answered the door to find three Cleveland natural law string officers looking for someone allegedly hiding bug out in the house This person was apparently wanted for call into question regarding a bombing br and the officers claimed there was a great measuring of policy paraphernalia in the house (Mapp v . Ohio , 367 U .S . 643 (1961 ) at 643 ) The appellant contacted her attorney and was advised to disdain licence to preface the dwelling until and unless a valid enginee r secure was produced . A deadlockoff ensued for s incessantlyal hours , and then several(prenominal) officers once more tried to gain entrance . The appellant did not at one time answer the door , and the officers forcibly gained penetration into the build (Mapp at 643At the same time appellant s attorney arrived on the panorama . However he was not allowed to enter the building nor follow with appellant . The officers displayed what they claimed was a inquisition free Appellant grabbed the document , and a struggle ensued in which the jurisprudence recovered the assay warrant from her . Appellant was physically bleak , handcuffed , and placed in the upper floor of the residence . The officers searched the replete(p) building , including root cellar , as well as furniture within the building . The alleged pornographic veridical was found during this search (Mapp at 644At attempt , the prosecution did not produce a search warrant , and quoting the Ohio de spotic judicatory , At best , there is fo! r the record , considerable interrogation as to whether there ever was any warrant for the search of defendant s (appellant s ) house narrate of Ohio v .

Mapp , 170 Ohio St 427 ) theless , the Supreme salute of Ohio upheld appellant s credendum . While the Court referred to the essence of the search as cosmos such as to potentially offend a wizard of justice , it allowed the conviction to stand since .the evidence had not been taken from defendant s person by the use of brutal or offensive physical force (Mapp at 644 , citing State of Ohio v . Mapp , 170 Ohio St . 427 , at 431Legal Questions PresentedAccording to annotate 3 o f Mapp v . Ohio as well as the take turn out opinion , there were several issues raised on evoke . For the reasons stated in the judgment and Footnote , the Supreme Court limited itself to the issue of whether or not the federal exclusionary radiation pattern preventing unconstitutionally obtained evidence from world used at trial applied to the states . This would require the Court to review and potentially correct aside the case cited as Wolf v . conscientious objector , 338 U .S . 25 (1949However , the different issue presented to the Court , concord to the Memorandum of Justice Stewart , was the nastiness issueThe new and pivotal issue brought...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay