Final Exam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Final Exam - Essay Example Through examining an understanding these externalities, the reader can come to a more warmed understanding with respect to the ways in which it integrates with the needs of the respective stakeholders in question. Firstly, in seeking to understand the means through which organizational design. Impact upon the stakeholders, it is necessary to consider scientific management and the means through which this theory represents both positive and negative externalities (Knox & Walsh, 2005). Firstly, even though scientific management has been widely criticized by those seeking to understand different approaches to organizational design and theory within the past several decades, it nonetheless bears useful levels of understanding with respect to the way in which stakeholders can integrate with one another and maximize the level of efficiency that they ultimately are responsible for providing to the firm. As such, scientific management is oftentimes been defined as the following, the provisio n of a direct incentive system, a scientific training of workers, the creation of science or individual responsibilities, the division of work duties between managers and workers, and ensure that work is done in a timely and efficient manner (Perrow, 1979). However, even though each of these determinants is useful in helping to maximize efficiency of the given entity/firm, it is ultimately impossible to engage the personal realities of the individual stakeholders based upon these previously mentioned determinants. In short, even though the scientific approach is effective in helping to promote an integrated understanding of the way in which work should be delineated between stakeholders of the organization, it is so completely incapable of dealing with the dynamics of interpersonal communication, diversity, and a litany of other factors that it is widely discredited and unable to speak to all of the needs of a given organization. Further compounding the level of quantitative analysi s and the overall paucity of qualitative measurement, Taylor’s theory of scientific management is focused upon maximization of output while diminishing the overall quantity of input. Naturally, this is oftentimes done as a means of affecting a positive level of profitability within the firm/entity. However, such an approach does not factor in the way in which any type of employee need it might be represented that would require an alternate approach be engaged * Breton & Wintrobe, 1986). As can quickly be realized from a brief analysis of industry within the past, scientific management has been utilized as a means of taking advantage of workers, providing horrific working conditions, and losing sight of the fact that a given firm or business entity is ultimately responsible for ethical standards in the treatment of its employees and its consumers. As such, the reforms of the progressive era further underscore the fact that even though scientific management, and the approaches that engages, can be useful in certain situations, following this wholeheartedly and applying it strictly throughout the entire business environment is ultimately harmful to the level of growth, profitability, and success that a given firm might hope to exhibit. Similarly, even though the issues that have thus far been elaborated upon with regards to scientific manage